Skip to main content
All pills Phase 1 · Win 10 minutes

Talk straight to the client

Pill 1.3 · Quick win · Zero installation

Hugo at the El Roble consultation explains Lúa\

Hugo was right about everything. And yet, Lúa\'s owners left the consultation without having understood a thing. IRIS stage, phosphorus, prescription diet: he said it quickly, correctly and completely. Too quickly. The Figueroas\' renal cat was going home with a treatment her owners couldn\'t explain even to themselves.

Read the full story

The scene

Mr Figueroa nods. Nods again. And Hugo, who has been talking fast and well for twenty minutes, still hasn\'t noticed what Marta would have seen in two seconds: that\'s not the face of someone who understands — it\'s the face of someone who stopped following a while ago and doesn\'t dare say so. Lúa, the Figueroas\' black-and-white cat, is thirteen years old and has a chronic kidney disease they\'ve just confirmed: creatinina above range, SDMA high and urine no longer concentrating well. Hugo has explained everything — the IRIS stage, the high phosphorus, the prescription diet, the check-ups every three months — he\'s explained it well, with the values on screen and the technical name for each thing. He\'s proud of how clearly he\'s communicated. And then Mrs Figueroa, who writes everything down in a little notebook and asks better questions than anyone, asks the only question that matters: "But then, doctor… can this be cured?". Hugo opens his mouth to answer and feels something sink inside him. It can\'t be cured. He\'s already said that. He said it in plain terms ten minutes ago. And the woman didn\'t hear it, because it came after "creatinina" and "SDMA" and she got lost along the way. The waiting room is full. And Hugo, for the first time in a long time, doesn\'t know if the problem is theirs or his.

The nudge

That afternoon, Marta passes him in the corridor and, without raising her voice, drops one of her lines: "You were completely right, Hugo. And they left without understanding. Being right wasn\'t the job." It\'s not a telling-off. It\'s worse: it\'s true. Hugo carries that with him for the rest of the day — he, who prides himself on being fast, went so fast that he left two frightened people behind. And that night, instead of dwelling on it, he does what he knows how to do: picks up his phone. But this time not to show off a tool. To fix his mistake.

The task

Translating the clinical into what the client understands: cutting the jargon, finding the comparison that illuminates, telling a difficult diagnosis without frightening or overwhelming. Doing it well, out loud and on the first attempt, with a full waiting room, doesn\'t always work — and reworking the explanation, finding the right example and leaving a written summary for them to take away is, easily, ten minutes per difficult case. Ten minutes you almost never have when you need them most.

\n

The unlock

Hugo didn\'t need to say less. He needed to say it differently. That night he tells the AI the case exactly as he\'d describe it to a colleague — plain, with the values and the technical name for each thing — and asks for something very specific: to explain it to the owner. No jargon, with an everyday comparison, in a calm tone and without promising what isn\'t there. The AI gives him back two pieces: a spoken explanation he can use as a script while looking the Figueroas in the eye, and a short paragraph he can print and hand to them to take home.

And here is what Hugo truly learns, which is twofold. First: the tool gives you the words; the tone is yours. Reading a perfect text at full speed convinces no one — the ten minutes you save looking for the right example are exactly for spending more slowly, making eye contact and letting them ask questions. And second, this is clinical: check the comparison before using it. A poorly chosen analogy lies. If the AI were to say the kidney «gets cleaned and comes out as good as new», it would be promising a cure that doesn\'t exist. That the metaphor is faithful — as well as easy — is your call, not its.

\n
Play video: Hugo translates Lúa\'s diagnosis for the Figueroas with the help of ChatGPT6:49
Screencast with Lúa\'s real case (CKD IRIS stage 2) at El Roble: Hugo translates the diagnosis for the Figueroas using ChatGPT, from technical jargon to an explanation that reassures and converts.
Audio in Spanish · subtitles in English, Spanish and Portuguese.
\n

The translation, in action

Look at it with Lúa\'s case. This is what Hugo wrote to the AI that night, plain and without a single piece of owner data:

Gata, 13 años. Enfermedad renal crónica, IRIS estadio 2.\nCreatinina 2,4 · SDMA 22 · fósforo alto · densidad urinaria baja.\nPlan: dieta renal de prescripción y control analítico en 3 meses.

Compare the two versions of the same diagnosis:

\n
What Hugo rattled off

«Lúa is at IRIS stage 2, with creatinina at 2.4 and SDMA at 22. She has hiperfosfatemia, so we\'re starting a prescription renal diet to bring the phosphorus down and modulate the protein. Urinary density is low — she\'s lost concentrating ability. We\'ll need to monitor proteinuria and blood pressure. Review in three months.»

All correct. And Mrs Figueroa had stopped at "creatinina".

\n
What the AI gave back — and Hugo used as a script

«Lúa\'s kidneys work like a filter: they clean the blood and hold back whatever\'s left over. With age, that filter has gradually worn down and no longer cleans as well. We can\'t reverse that — we\'re not going to fit her with a new filter — but we can reduce its workload so that what she has lasts as long as possible and Lúa stays comfortable. That\'s why we\'re switching her food to one specially designed for the kidneys: it contains less of what she now finds hard to eliminate. With that and a couple of check-ups, many cats like Lúa go on living their normal lives for quite some time. Is there anything you\'d like me to explain again?»

\n

That night Hugo didn\'t wait for the next visit. He sent them a WhatsApp: the written note — so they\'d have it to hand — and a short audio where, in his own voice and without rushing, he apologised for having gone so fast and explained it again. The words had come from the AI; the "sorry" and the tone had not.

\n
The note he sent them by WhatsApp: «Lúa has a chronic kidney disease. It can\'t be cured, but it can be managed and she can live well. At home: 1) give her only the renal food we\'ve indicated, with no treats or scraps of normal food; 2) make sure she always has fresh, clean water available; 3) come back for the check-up when we schedule it. If she eats less, drinks much more or vomits, call us. Any questions, we\'re here.»
\n

Same diagnosis, same truth — it can\'t be cured. The difference is that this time the Figueroas left feeling calm and knowing what to do. And a client who understands follows the treatment. That is medicine.

\n

Do it yourself in 4 steps

  1. Open ChatGPT / Gemini / Claude and start a new chat.
  2. Paste the full prompt (you have it in your phone notes).
  3. At the end of the prompt, write your case plainly and anonymised: species, age and the clinical picture. No owner names.
  4. Send. Use it as a script — or an audio — and send the note to the client. Read it first: your judgement rules, and the tone is yours.
Tip: keep the base prompt in your phone notes so you always have it to hand.
\n

The prompt · copy it

You are my assistant for explaining diagnoses to pet owners, not to vets.\nI give you a diagnosis or clinical term with the patient\'s data and you translate it\nso that a frightened person with no medical background can understand it.\n\nGive me TWO things:\n1) A spoken explanation I can use as a script in the consultation or in an audio for\n   the client: no medical jargon, with ONE everyday comparison that makes it easy to\n   understand, in a calm and empathetic tone, without alarming and without promising\n   what isn\'t there (if it can\'t be cured, let that come through gently). Invite the\n   owner to ask questions.\n2) A short paragraph (maximum 80 words) that I can print or send by WhatsApp,\n   with what the owner needs to do at home, clear and in order.\n\nRules:\n- Use only what I give you. Do not invent data, doses or prognoses.\n- If the comparison you propose implies cure or reversibility, discard it:\n  the metaphor must be faithful to the real prognosis.\n- Professional yet approachable English.\n- Do not include owner names or personally identifiable data.\n\nPaste the case here (species, age, diagnosis or clinical term and the essentials of the plan):
\n

Before → Now

Before

10 min re-explaining, searching for the example that illuminates and, even so, owners who leave with doubts.

Now

1 min for a clear explanation and a summary the client takes away — and attention free for what truly convinces: the tone. Per difficult case.

\n
The Figueroas at home, calm, with Lúa on the sofa: they understand the diagnosis and know what to do thanks to Hugo\
The "after": the Figueroas calm, with Lúa and with a clear plan. From being right to truly accompanying.
\n

Before you start

Client data, out: describe species, age and diagnosis; never owner names, phone numbers or identifiable data in a generic LLM. Always anonymise.
  • You decide what gets said. The AI finds the words; the clinical content, the prognosis and what to tell each client are your call.
  • Check the comparison, not just the text. An easy but false analogy (one that suggests cure where there is none) does more harm than jargon. Let it illuminate without lying.
  • Read the explanation before using it: make sure it doesn\'t oversimplify or promise what isn\'t there.
  • Works on free plans (with a daily usage limit).
  • Requires a connection: it is processed in the cloud.
Need help?